2017-2018 Undergraduate Catalog

Academic Honesty

Academic honesty is essential to the integrity of the mission and success of the University and is expected of all students. It is the responsibility of every student to avoid dishonest practices. There are eight broad areas of academic dishonesty: (1) obtaining unauthorized aid or information; (2) giving unauthorized aid or information; (3) committing plagiarism from written, electronic, or internet sources; (4) misrepresenting facts or data; (5) offering bribes; (6) using library resources unethically; (7) using computer resources unethically; and (8) knowingly assisting in any of the above practices.  For the most current version of this policy and other academic policies, visit the University Policy Library.

A charge of academic dishonesty can be brought against a student by an instructor, a staff member, or another student in consultation with an instructor. The instructor or staff member will consult with the chairperson/director who may then notify the Registrar to put an academic hold on the course to prevent the student from dropping the class. The instructor or staff member then will notify the student in writing of the formal charge. If the instructor involved is a chairperson or director, the instructor will consult with the Associate Provost or Vice Provost before moving forward with the process. While in standard cases the instructor will give the student an automatic “F” in the course, the instructor, in consultation with the chair, director, or Associate Provost, has the discretion to alter sanctions as appropriate. If the student chooses to appeal the charge of the instructor, the student may stay in the class until the appeal process is completed. All cases of academic dishonesty will be reported by the chairperson/director to the Associate Provost or Vice Provost, and to the Provost.

Once the charge is made, the student has the right to appeal. The student must make the appeal in writing to the department chairperson/school director within 10 academic days of receiving the charge. The chairperson/director (or Associate Provost if the case involves a chairperson, or Vice Provost if the case involves a director) will then appoint a committee of at least three faculty or staff members from the department/school who are not directly involved in the case to consider the appeal. If the appeal fails, the student may then petition the Academic Appeals Committee. The student must make the appeal in writing to the Academic Appeals Committee, through the Office of the University Registrar, within 10 academic days of receiving formal notification from the departmental committee. A charge that is successfully appealed will be reported by the appropriate committee to the chairperson/director of the appropriate department/school, to the Associate Provost or Vice Provost, and to the Provost so that the charge that has already been reported will be expunged from the record.

During the appeals process the departmental/school committee or the Academic Appeals Committee may alter the sanctions. In standard cases, the instructor’s sanction will stand and the student will be prohibited from further attending the course. The second instance will result in immediate dismissal from the University.